Creating the Decision Environment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Creating the Decision Environment - Essay ExampleThis is happens because the assemblage welcome outside opinions, so in that location is no objectivity. This nominate be prevented by always having a neutral spokespersony that hasnt been part of the theme. This brings insight to it, and also leaves room for questioning of that decision and with this, a better decision is made. (Virtualsoft, 2009) Belief in Inherent Morality of the Group The group has a objectset that the decision they have made is incorrupt and ethical, this is because the group assume that they have done right. To prevent this kind of problem. The group should give the analogous scenario to an anonymous group of different people and gauge their responses to tell whether their decision is right (Janis, 2009). Collective Rationalization This happens when the group makes a decision and they believe it rational. This happens when the collection of material is highly selective and biased. This tends to leave out both(prenominal) information that does non fit into the groups decision and reason for the same. This can cause a big problem because when a decision is made without all the relevant information regarding is examined (Marlene & Antony, 1998). This is mostly because of the close mindedness in the group. This is can be avoided by bringing in experts to examine the problem and advise the group before a group decision can be made. With the inclusion of an expert, critical information is less likely to be omitted. Illusion of unanimity When the group look to each other to confirm their theories without consulting or involving an outside mention (Janis, 2009). This close-mindedness can cause problems during the decision making process. To avoid this, the leaders should not state preference initially. This influences the group and affects the decisions made. Self-Appointed mind guards this is also as a result of close mindedness, and the avoidance of troublesome ideas, these mind guard s are usually to protect the leader. To prevent this symptom, a devils advocate should be prescribed within the group and the sole purpose should be to critique every decision and look for flaws in it. This individual should ensure that alternatives are explored extensively. Stereotyping Excessive stereotyping is a major symptom of groupthink this happens when the group processs start forming and constructing ban stereotypes of other rival groups (Janis, 2009). This happens especially if the other groups opinions or ideas are not the same as theirs. This leads to the group shunning any external input leading to a decision that is a result of close mindedness. This can be prevented in decision making environments by always discussing what is mishap with others outside the group (Marlene & Antony, 1998). With this, diversity is brought into the group and the decision in question will have been vetted by different individuals not just the group members, this makes the decision so mu ch better. Pressure for conformity some other symptom of groupthink is the members pressure anyone in the group that expresses an opinion or argument that is against their beliefs or ideas. They make this member or members feel that they have to conform. They make them feel that expressing an idea different from theirs is a sign of disloyalty. So in situation where a member might have a differing opinion they do not express it because they want to